Understandable you might think as their primary concern will be the effects the wind farm might have on the species that inhabit the reserves.
But if you read on to the reasons for the objection you'll discover that 2 of the 3 reasons for objection relate to perceived disadvantages for our species.
The Trust's concerns are:
** Impacts of the turbines on wildlife, in particular birds, through direct collision with the turbine blades and displacement from the nature reserves due to disturbance from the turbines;
** Impacts on visitors to the nature reserves through noise and visual impact. Would the song of the skylark for example still be audible to visitors with wind turbines 200 metres away?
** Impacts on the fenland landscape character and open views.
** Impacts of the turbines on wildlife, in particular birds, through direct collision with the turbine blades and displacement from the nature reserves due to disturbance from the turbines;
** Impacts on visitors to the nature reserves through noise and visual impact. Would the song of the skylark for example still be audible to visitors with wind turbines 200 metres away?
** Impacts on the fenland landscape character and open views.
The EIA undertaken by the developers indicates that there would be little impact to the environment from the development.
"A number of protected species use the site but collision risk impact assessments show that none of these species would be significantly effected by the proposed wind farm"
Wild Frontier Ecology
So we're back to the reluctance of our species to do very much about the serious impact of global warming in the future, if it means compromising our pleasures today.
I'm a member of the LWT and I appreciate all that they do for increasing bio-diversity and protecting habitats but that doesn't excuse this selfish objection which has very little to do with concern for wildlife on a nature reserve that 4 years ago was a field of beans.
Dear James
ReplyDeleteThank you for expressing your thoughts on the LWT concerns about the Delph wind farm and I appreciate you setting out the contrary argument and demonstrating that the contary argument is backed by a robust analysis of survey work undertaken as part of the EIA that accompanies the planning application.
It would be helpful if you could write to South Holland District Council in support of the Delph wind farm and if your followers and supporters would also follow suit.
Comments can be submitted on line via:
http://www.sholland.gov.uk/doitonline/plandev/details.aspx?oref=H14-0110-13
or to:
Mr P Jackson
Head of Planning
South Holland District Council
Council Offices
Priory Road
Spalding
PE11 2XE
Thanks once again